How we chose
Our team works with clients every day to test and wear this kit on real sites, and we listen to their feedback alongside what people say online and on review sites. We bring it all together so you get clear, honest information to pick the right product for you.
Using our supplier certification data, we screened the certified picks against EN ISO 374-1:2016 and read the Type: A, B or C by how many of the listed test chemicals the glove resists, with the chemical letters on the label. We also read EN ISO 374-5 (bacteria, fungi and, where marked, virus), the EN 388:2016+A1:2018 mechanical code: abrasion (1–4), coup cut (1–5), tear (1–4), puncture (1–4) and the EN ISO 13997 TDM cut letter (A–F) where tested; X means not tested, EN 407 heat, EN 16350 antistatic properties and EN ISO 21420:2020 general requirements (sizing, dexterity 1–5, harmlessness).
Every pick is active and in stock, with clear photos and sizes available. Scores weight review quality (38%, a Bayesian average rating), review volume (17%), our product research (30%: trade bestseller signals, price against the market, colour range and verified standards), photo coverage (8%) and size availability (7%). We only show verified ratings and review counts, with links, we pick no more than two products per brand, and every review summary is written in our own words.
Review sources
